I don't know why this caught my attention in the first place, but anyway, here it is...
So by now you may have heard of Heather Mills, estranged second wife of Paul McCartney. Amidst rumors Mills was having an affair with her personal trainer McCartney filed for divorce, and rather than taking a settlement, Mills struck back with a lawsuit that could amount to hundreds of millions, and made some extremely serious claims about McCartney, including that he had stabbed her, abused her, and pushed her into a bathtub while she was pregnant with their child.
Those are strong words. But let's face it, rock stars have done so many crazy things over the years that it's not hard to swallow. If R.Kelly and is sleeping with 14 year old girls and Gary Glitter is molesting prepubescent ones, this still makes McCartney look pretty par for the course. So last year I took the claims at face value and just assumed that Paul McCartney was a total asshole.
But after seeing excerpts of her interview on American TV the other day, I'm not so sure about Mills. She's hitting every TV station she can, with even more claims, and some of them are beginning to contradict themselves.
"I've been constantly harassed by the press. I've received death threats, and when I asked Paul for help, he did nothing".
Well wait a minute- you turned down this guys divorce settlement to go on a public crusade against him, suing him for hundreds of millions of dollars. Why are you going to him for help? Do you really expect him to be your knight in shining armor right now?
To say nothing of the fact you've accused him of beating and stabbing you. If it's untrue, I don't blame him for not doing anything to help. And if it is true, it mystifies me why you would expect him, of all people, to help you out now even more. He's supposed to be the worst man alive, remember?
"I had an agreement with Paul that I would say nothing if he agreed to take public responsibility for the breakdown of our relationship. But he has said nothing, and so now I'm coming forward".
She says this a full year after her allegations, mind you.
Here's a thought- why does anybody have to "take public responsibility" for the break-up? Why should Paul McCartney, let alone her, have to say a single word about any of this to the press at all? Why should any of this be in the public domain at all? She seems very concerned how all this is playing out in the media, but by paying so much attention to their opinions, she's missing the most obvious option, which is keeping them out of their personal lives entirely.
I haven't heard a word from Paul McCartney about any of this, other than saying its for the courts to hear, and pleading the public to let them have their privacy, and he's getting much better press than her by simple virtue of keeping quiet. Why not follow his example?
"Stella McCartney [Fashion designer and Paul's older daughter] is an evil woman. She hated me and did everything in her power to break up our marriage and come between me and her father".
So now you're dragging this guy's kids into it too? What does that have to do with anything? More importantly, you've accused this guy of the lowest of low crimes of abuse. So why turn around and lash out at his daughter for scheming to distance him from you? You said he was a wife-beater that stabbed and hit you, remember? How bitter can you be at one of his kids for keeping you from a man like that?
"I've had secrets locked in a vault, and if anything happens to me, the public will know the truth".
Un-uh. First of all, this makes you sound completely hysterical. It's also illogical considering you're berating McCartney for not protecting you against the death threats. If you think he's trying to kill you, why whine that he won't pay for protection? If you think it's someone else, then what's it got to do with him?
As for the allegations you're vaulting, you've accused this guy of beating and stabbing you already. Anything he did more serious than that (molesting your kid? Sodomy with underage boys?) and you should be taking that information to the police, your divorce lawyers or both, not locking it into a vault and making weird, cryptic comments about the truth coming out if you die. It sounds more like a shrill attempt at blackmail than any honest attempt to handle the proceedings maturely.
But here's the thing- given her latest, most petty tirades, at this point it just seems like she's grabbing at straws, and slinging every last vindictive at the family she can think of. The telling thing is that as much as she goes on about telling the public the "truth", her allegations are getting less and less serious rather than more and more, which suggests that she's simply running out of things to say.
So then I got to thinking...Mills does a great job crying in public and looking like a poor, beaten waif. But her charity work aside, her actual record for behavior is shakier. Reports are out that she was a high priced call girl in the early 90's, and there are pictures of pornography she did at the age of 20. As far as marriages go, she was once divorced, and left her next fiance at the alter to run off with McCartney.
Meanwhile, by Rock Star standards, McCartney had been an exceptionally normal person. He married Linda Eastman back in the late 60's/early 70's, and stayed happily married to her for about 30 years until her untimely death. They had some well-adjusted, happy kids that became successful adults. So up until marrying Mills (without a pre-nup, making him look like even more of a sport), he had about as good a track record as you can get.
So given all that, who are you going to believe, him or her?